March 15, 2010

Obelisk: Sex in the City

In ancient times, the Obelisk represented the god Osiris’ “missing” male organ, which Isis was not able to find after her husband/brother was slain and chopped into fourteen pieces by Seth. Isis replaced the missing organ with an Obelisk and magically impregnated herself with Horus, the resurrected Osiris. This legend formed the core of Egyptian cosmology and was fantastically venerated on the most imposing scale throughout all of Egypt by towering Obelisks, including at Karnak where the upright Obelisks (of Osiris) were “vitalized” or “stimulated” from the energy of the masturbatory Sun god Ra shining down upon them. Modern people, especially in America, may view these symbols as profane or pornographic, but they were in fact ritualized objects the ancients believed could produce tangible reactions, properties, or “manifestations” within the material world. The Obelisk and Dome as imitations of the deities’ male and female reproductive organs can be seen all over the world…

This Obelisk you see above was brought from Egypt and erected at the Vatican.

Through such ‘imitative sex’, the Dome and Obelisk could be “energy receivers” capable of assimilating Ra’s essence from the rays of the sun, which in turn drew forth the “seed” of the underworld Osiris. The seed of the dead deity would, according to the supernaturalism, transmit upward from out of the underworld through the base (testes) of the Obelisk and magically ejaculate from the tower’s head into the womb (Dome) of Isis. In this way, Osiris could be “born again” or reincarnated as Horus over and over….

How many times have we seen fireworks exploding over obelisks around the world?!

ABOVE: Image from Renegade X released Nov 2009, a ‘command and conquer’ style game.
Renegade X: The game revolves around a war between the Global Defense Initiative, and the Brotherhood of Nod. Each faction would have their own base of operations consisting of buildings. A team had to work together to destroy the enemy base, while keeping theirs intact. Obelisk/Advanced Guard Tower (Base defenses) Without these, your team has no automatic defense…

Canary wharf is an enormous glass obelisk. After its construction the Government decided to spend a billion pounds to build the Millenium Dome which was the focus of the celebration at the time of the millenium. As discussed, the symbolism of the obelisk and dome draw in solar and cosmic energies: they are important illuminati brotherhood symbols. Interestingly, I found out that not only was Peter Mandelson dubbed “the Prince of Darkness” but he was the same fellow that brought in the red rose as the Labour party symbol!

Millenium Dome & Canary Wharf, London

Across the planet, the elite have criss-crossed and interlaced the world with a network of phallic and other sexual monuments, statues and buildings. These objects are ‘hidden’ in plain sight. Illuminati architects are regularly commissioned to erect phallic obelisks and towers and mammary-breast domed buildings, which serve as cultic idols of worship. These strange, monumental idols celebrate the ancient, pagan Mystery Religions to which the modern Illuminists subscribe.

Why, for example, are four cities—Paris, Rome, London, and New York—each adorned by a towering Egyptian obelisk? Why are the Egyptian obelisks in London and New York both named “Cleopatra’s Needle?”

In ancient Egypt, in Babylon and in classical Greece and Rome, sexual salons and temples flourished, places where holy priestesses (prostitutes) and priest-sodomites were ritually “yoked” with devoted believers. In these religions, sexual intercourse in a mysterious, esoteric, religious setting was considered highly desirable as a pathway to initiation, self-divinity, and spiritual advancement.

Because of structures like the newly erected Agbar Tower (above), Barcelona, Spain is jokingly referred to as the “Phallic Capital of the World.”

Daily Deeliberation: The Rockefeller empire alone now owns more than 60% of the pharmaceutical industry in the United States.

March 13, 2010

“We The People” are losing the plot…

I had forgotten how much I enjoy Michael Tsarion.

For a while now, Alex Jone’s podcast has been high on my audio playlists- simply because he talks about current affairs, today’s news and the various globalist agenda’s mapped out across the globe. He does an enormous job, and he does a great job. However, there has always been that niggling feeling that to base the growing Truth Moment’s objectives on abolishing the Fed and re-establishing the Constitution only really scratches the surface- and, as Tsarion rightly points out in the excellent and comprehensive article  The Constitution Con we not only fail to critque the motives of the Founding Father’s themselves (rather elevate them to God-like saviours of all Americans) we also fail to decipher the actual words entailed within the document which have allowed the Fed to come into being and the state of affairs we have today- something which The Constitution Con does so in great depth.

There is of course more to the NWO than threats to personal gun ownership, False Flag terror, the ability to communicate freely on the internet and The Patriot Act. These are mere symptoms of a historical tyranny which stems throughout human civilisation. It is also at times when AJ talks about immigration when I find myself wincing; his heighted nationalism and conservatism sometimes sickens me! I have concsiously deviated back to the world of Icke and Tsarion as they are less alarmist, have more positive outlooks and seem to provide real future promise. There is something pretty morbid sometimes listening to the doom and gloom world of AJ walking down the street. I see Tsarion in particular as a real inspirational researcher who talks logically and particularly thouroughly. I guess like any truther we have to use research already done to springboard concepts of our own and not only enlighten ourselves, but those around us who may be open to learning new things about the world around us.

Constantly questioning the world is seriously exhausting! Seeing systems of control for what they are is predominantly liberating, occasionally distressing and sometimes annoying. It does take over your life, but I will never stop.

A short extract from The Constitution Con (available at

WE THE RULING ARISTOCRACY, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution FOR THE SLAVES WITHOUT RIGHTS, UNDER OUR FEDERAL CONTROL.

The first rendering implies that the Constitution has been granted to one body by another. Ergo, the Constitution is nothing more than a totalitarian document, ratifying aristocratic control over the “United States of America,” and its inhabitants. The elites are literally saying; “This document and its articles are for you.” The point being, that it is not of you, meaning, it is not yours by natural right. The word “for” indicates that the matter of the document is bestowed by another. And of course, when a person gives someone something, they presumably want something in return. This was certainly the case for the Federalists who conceived the Constitution.

Because “People” is capitalized it is a proper noun referring to a specific body of people Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)

These facts explain why the word “for” is to be found in the last line, and not the word “of.” Legally, there is a big difference between:

…do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


…do ordain and establish this Constitution of the United States of America.

February 2, 2010

Lord Monckton – Melbourne 1st February 2010 – ETS Conference



The Sofitel Hotel Grand Ballroom was filled to capacity with a majority of the kind of Melburnians who were demonstrably happy to obediently chant the Lord’s Prayer before the anticipated Lord Monckton took to the stage. I was seriously wondering whether I had inadvertently stepped in to the wrong event; climate change skeptic Powerpoint slides to amuse earlycomers- check, Ian Plimer – check, hard uncomfortable chairs – check, but what was with the church-like introduction and the slow moving sea of Christian suited and booted conservatives? I looked about me for further clarification: I could have easily been lured in subconsciously by the free offering of jugs of cold water in the hotel lobby- it was a scorcher of a Melbourne afternoon [enter joke about global warming]. I wallowed in the fact that I hadn’t dressed up at all and was possibly going to obtain footage of some kind of secret meeting and had got in undetected by the hotel security. On the flipside I contemplated that I may have just shelled out $20 for a glass of water and a prayer in the Hotel prayer room facility.

“Good Afternoon, almost evening, Gentlemen” it begins.  

Really?! Have I made it into the ranks of knighthood? Why did nobody else seem to shift uncomfortably in their seats at this omission to address female attendees? As a side contemplation: when do we officially announce Evening? I would have left quietly at this stage if I wasn’t squished betwix two burly suits. I relax once Ian Plimer, famed Australian geologist begins with a general introduction into proven global warmings and coolings- The Little Ice Age, the Medieval Warm Period and our billion years of climate change to set the scene.

 I look around me once again and silently hope that the man in the grey suit who approaches the podium after the Lords Prayer to excited hand clapping, the 3rd Viscount of Brenchley Christopher Lord Monckton, could be our real hope of exposing the climate change fraud. Gee-wizz, he certainly has the aristocratic ‘zazz.

 “Correlation need not imply causation”, he begins. The proceeding slide was a dot chart speculating the correlation between the amount of Republican Senators in the US over a period of time against the occurrences of sunspots. The crowd seems to enjoy this pretty amusing start to the talk (and also seemed versed enough in sunspot theory enough to chuckle unhindered by any embarrassing incomprehension).Lord Monckton, eloquent and knowledgeable (and so posh he squeaked) stood to the stand and began to go through some rather complicated looking equations and charts; each PowerPoint slide heralding a Royal Portcullis (see above) positioned aloft dot charts and eugenicist-laden quotes by Al Gore (where he most cleverly substituted the word “lie” for “lay” as some kind of archaic pop at the American accent) or some equally nasty fellow affiliated with the UN, Greenpeace or the WWF.

A powerful argument against the ETS proposals is the hindering of Third World development. As most of us will already know, areas of the Third World which would traditionally be used for growing crops to feed the population are now being converted into areas generating “Biofuels”. Haiti, Lord Monckton points out, was one of the areas this happened most prominently. By limiting the available land for producing foodstuffs, clearly food prices go up, food becomes a ‘weapon’ [the UN has put out dozens of public documents calling for an 80% world population reduction. Catherine Bertini, the head of the UN food programs in 1995, paraphrased the famous Kissinger statement, “Food is power. We use it to change behavior.“]. The African Energy Cycle diagram, though crudely simple [why did he simplify and skim over worded slides and dwell on equations and fractal diagrams that only a Mathematics graduate would understand?] portrayed that the basic ‘Source, Transmission and Use’ system of generating power that will be destroyed under an ETS system and thus holding back the Third World in terms of self sufficiency and imported food reliance [so what is new?].

Lord Monckton did provide me with a lovely new fact about our friend Al Gore which I think everybody should know. It is alleged that during the filming of An Inconvenient Truth Señor Gore purchased a $4m condo in St Regis CA, only feet from the sea(a particular area he proposed would be under the sea)!  

In the UK, where they have implemented an ETS scheme already, Monckton suggested that industry is shifting overseas to China or India (who will not sign any form of ETS) destroying jobs, the economy, an increased tax bill and, yes [shock horror] a larger carbon footprint. China, it is suggested, are not going to be signing any agreement and have increased coal power plants by 1 or 2 per week. The Chairman of the IPCC owns a steel industry in Redcar, England, moved to India (the Chairman’s birth country) losing approximately 1700 UK jobs but gaining some elusive Carbon Credits for doing such a grand job of weakening the UK in the numerous aforementioned ways [ for the greener good, of course].  

The cost of Climate Change Policy, he goes on, producing a simple bar chart of how much is being spent on such ETS schemes and policies so far. Focused Adaptation he says is the answer: Paying the charge at the point [‘of sale’] and not in taxes.  

According to Monckton, The Copenhagen Treaty, Paragraph 38 stipulated:  

  • Give Government the right to set the global market- i.e an end to ‘free’ trade
  • Give Government the power to levy taxes as it feels necessary
  • Deemed ‘wealthy’ nations will be taxed 2% of their GDP
  • 2% tax on ALL financial transactions
  • 300 alleged new bureaucracies
  • A world-wide cap and trade regime
  • Unlimited non-compliance fines.


… And no democratic provisions he declares! Did anyone versed in NWO literature believe there would be?! Australia is not a democracy- the two party system as it is elsewhere in the western world is a fraud, funded by the same people.   

He started with “Global warming has been going on for 300 years” but now there has been “no global warming for a decade”. The IPCC declared in 1990 until 1995 that any warming on the planet could not be attributable to anthropogenic causes. The in 1995, one man suggested that the body of evidence now points to a discernable human influence on global climate. They go on in 1995 to stipulate that there is a 90% probability of human influence on the climate. Monckton mocks the IPCC stating that their ‘scientific methods’ are comparable to the talk attendees putting their hands up and the board taking that as scientific fact. Although he makes a valid point- you simply can’t stipulate a probability based on data such as the possibility of human activity.  

So, we are told- in the end- we cannot actually predict the climate anyway; that sun spot theory, cloud cover theory, other pollutants, manipulated data, having BBQ’s beneath temperature gauges in the US, fractal equations and the NWO all confuse the picture [snigger]. So what does he call for? A Royal Commission investigation into the ‘facts’! Thunderous applause from around me.

During the hasty Q and A section, a man questioned Monckton’s “cherry picking” of data from the IPCC and failure to acknowledge other aspects of the IPCC reports was threatened with removal from the vicinity if he did not let the Viscount speak! I found the over-reaction (it happened twice) to people questioning the ‘truth’ portrayed in the talk astonishing. Is this the democracy you speak of? How we would would throw our hands up if this happened at an Al Gore talk! The talk was in my opinion rather disjointed, complicated where it needn’t be and simplified where it shouldn’t have been. It also, in my opinion failed to provide any new listeners to our argument with the overarching real picture of the political framework the ETS really is set in. The IPCC have already been shown to have lied- the story is out there. The attempts to implement World Government in Copenhagen should have taken a few more slides. I ask you Lord Monckton: what is your agenda? Why did you choose a Maltese Cross to put behind you for no reason other than to speculate hypothetically what an equation would look like (the equation was a Mandelbrot fractal) – I wished my camera caught the moment more effectively, I would have posted it.


A lot of people will have attended the talk and enjoyed the pompous humour and religious, conservative hoo-rah [and free cooled water in stemmed glassware]. I pray [in an unreligious way] that Lord Monckton is our man to bring it to the public knowledge that Global Warming is a fraud, that the Climategate emails do question everything we think we know about science ‘fact’, that scientists at that level are paid to manipulate data for political means and that an investigation [preferably not a Monarch-funded one] should be demanded.  

I also think there is a new danger in that the boundaries between the big ‘climate change debate’ and general environmental concerns have been blurred: To be against a ETS or a Cap and Trade Scheme does not make a person ‘anti-environment’. I would surmise that having knowing the facts surrounding the history of this manufactured environmental movement, which stinks of the eugenics ideology if you look further back enough means you see the bigger picture, care about the Third World and care about the potential to cripple ourselves by propping up a green flag we know nothing at all about apart from that in our society it looks good to support the cause. I urge every supporter of such ‘action’ groups as the WWF and Greenpeace to look into the group’s history, their facts and leaders.  


 I also ask myself- does it matter if he exposes at least part of the NWO agenda? “Quid Est Vertitas [Tintoretto]” he declared fervently, using an old painting of the questioning by Pontius Pilate as a visual prop (cleverly providing the Christian majority in the crowd with a moral reference point). A few nodding, questioning heads and I’m sure some angsty clenched fists in laps. Where do we go from here? Is it as simple as “No taxation without verification”? In which case, I want out.

January 31, 2010

Late Night Musings: The Distraction of Politics.

“Rothschild might watch a large batch of seedlings for ten years. He’d wait until they had flowered in order to pick out the very best ones in the lot- and destroy the rest. This was a strict rule. He wanted not one flower of merely good quality in his garden”…


Are we the seedlings?

Nobody wants to admit their infallibility. Humanity’s inferiority complex has seemingly haunted every aspect of modern society within the last 100 years, particularly it has been said, with the invention of (but really the clever integration of) Psycho-analysis, Sociology and Public relations. Edward Bernays, the ‘founder’ of the Public Relations machine that has formed the backbone of our consumerist society (calling it “Propaganda” was, as he has admitted himself, “too obvious”…) [See ‘Century of The Self‘- By Adam Curtis]. Our wants are now our needs. How have we got it all so wrong? Why is a lack of this ‘wealth’ we call money [adorned with freakish satanic/bloodline/illuminati symbolism] really poverty? Why is possessing more of it give us strength?

An image of a ‘utopia’ [I keep going back to a wonderful book, The Faber Book of Utopias which has some wonderful Utopian ponderings of well-known philosophers and authors; extracts and essays from history dating back as far as 800BC to the present day- I recommend to all] is not easy to fabricate in one’s mind amidst the ‘truth seeking’ mantra of what is bad; what is doom, gloom and [KA]boom. Where do we take our learned politics? Venus project? (see pic below) What about right now? In the life that we are living?

The world just ticks on by, rotating on it’s axis getting closer to the sun; shooting through space tens of thousands of miles an hour (have found it tricksy to find an exact figure on this one…). The ultimate goal of humanity should be to search for the truth; for explanation, exploration and, if we are lucky, some form of enlightenment at the end of it. Our manned quests into space have ventured no further than the moon. The MOON! Didn’t we [pretend] we did this back in ’69? It seems ludicrous to me that billions of dollars are spent on defence budgets to effectively wage wars with countries and create destruction everywhere when we don’t (or appear to not) spend much money on space exploration projects! We are all standing on a rotating dusty rock.

This life is a charade. It is one big happy smiling confusing annoying show. A World Fiction Show. The government are not the puppets. We are. Such a distraction is the biggest con of all time. Our own spirits are being sold to: told who to trust, who to love, what to desire, what to buy.

January 6, 2010

Cosmopolis- New World Order membership- The principles of the NWO

When I got given a first edition copy of ‘The Shape of Things to Come’ by H.G.Wells for Christmas this year, I found this insert inside the book…

P.S. Just in case you are planning to end off your membership fee… The address is now an art gallery.

December 17, 2009

“A Very Interesting Concept” (Dr. Archelle Georgiou): Drink up the Lithium you Happy Slaves

Crikey, Fox News are actually reporting a news story worth listening to. Hats off. This one time.
They have reported on some sickening Japanese research which suggests that adding Lithium (yes, the same stuff Bi-Polar sufferers use to make ’em happy and docile) into our mains water will help stop us all commit suicide. How good of them…
“The foundation of all mental illness is the unwillingness to experience legitimate suffering.” ~Carl Jung
Anyway, back to the news…
Dr. Archelle Georgiou, described as a well-recognized physician leader who “helps consumers make better health care decisions,” argues the case for adding lithium to the water supply. Georgiou is affiliated with the Center for Health Transformation, an organization founded by the notorious neocon Newt Gingrich. Georgiou is also a “medical expert” for Fox News 9 in Minneapolis where she commented on a proposal to drug people during a segment on “Health Care Innovations 2009.” “Lithium in the Water Supply: America has been adding fluoride to its public water supplies for decades to help prevent reduce tooth decay. Now researchers from Japan suggests expanding the list to lithium”. [read more]
Japanese researchers, according to Georgiou, are “investigating whether trace amounts of lithium can just change the mood in a community enough — in a really positive way without having the bad effects of lithium — to really affect the mood and decrease the suicide rate.”
I’m sorry, did we miss something? What a frightening moral concept. Dangerous levels of pharmacutical drugs have already infiltrated our water supply and as if fluoride intake wasn’t enough, the good people pulling the strings in society want us to become even more docile and reluctant to fight back by mass ‘medication’ [if you can call it that]. How obvious does it all need to be before every person wakes up to the attempts of the NWO mongers to supress us and enslave us and kill us. Lithium not only makes you docile but makes you ‘happy docile’ which has even more of a disasterous potential for the human population. Happy smiling slaves. It sickens me.
The amount of lithium in the human body is approximately 7 mg. Lithium has no known biological use, and it is not readily absorbed by the body. Most lithium is excreted directly upon uptake. Although lithium is not an essential element, it may influence metabolism. Upon oral intake lithium is mildly toxic. Physical tolerance differs between individuals. In the 1940s some patients that applied lithium chloride as a salts replacement died.
Lithium carbonate is applied in psychiatry in doses pretty close to the maximum intake level. At 10 mg/L of blood one is mildly poisoned, at 15 mg/L one experiences confusion and speech impairment, and at 20 mg/L there is a risk of lethality.
Coming in contact with lithium, like other alkali metals, leads to internal blistering.

Read more:

I’m so happy. Cause today I found my friends.
They’re in my head. I’m so ugly. But that’s ok.
‘Cause so are you. We’ve broke our mirrors.
Sunday morning. Is everyday for all I care.
And I’m not scared. Light my candles. In a daze cause I’ve found god.

Yeah yeah yeah yeah…..

I’m so lonely. And that’s ok. (alt: ’cause today )
I shaved my head. And I’m not sad, and just maybe
I’m to blame for all I’ve heard. And I’m not sure.
I’m so excited. I can’t wait to meet you there.
And I don’t care. I’m so horny. But that’s ok. My will is good.

Yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah…..

I like it. I’m not gonna crack.
I miss you. I’m not gonna crack.
I love you.I’m not gonna crack.
I killed you. I’m not gonna crack. (x2)

I’m so happy. Cause today I found my friends.
They’re in my head. I’m so ugly. But that’s ok.
‘Cause so are you. We’ve broke our mirrors.
Sunday morning. Is everyday for all I care.
And I’m not scared. Light my candles.
In a daze cause I’ve found god.

Yeah yeah yeah yeah…..


Back to: The World Fiction Show

November 30, 2009

“Economic Harmonisation”: ‘NO’-santo

Our worst nightmare in the area of organic farming is about to come true. There is a conspiracy among multinational GM companies [and their friends, the puppets in government], to make Organic farming unviable by regulating them out of the market. The day is almost upon us. The global companies with their puppeteers in government are about to make it impossible for you to buy anything other than their products.

Codex Alimentarus has slowly crept to the back of my mind over the past year.  For anyone just beginning to delve into the magical world of Codex Alimentarius it can be pretty scary.

As soon as 31st December 2009 the Codex Alimentarius Commission will be disregard input from those who offer a counter perspective to the combined forces of Big Farmer & Big ‘Pharma’.

Transnational corporations who are primarily focused on increasing their market share, by pushing their desired and arbitrary regulatory “standards” (not mine or yours) into a global standard all in the name of “international regulatory excellence”. It’s just another arm of the planetary regime ideology imposed by the NWO-mongers.

CA concerns all food traded internationally and allows high doses of pesticides, veterinary drugs, synthetic hormones, contaminants, artificial sweeteners, and other dangerous compounds and processes while it forbids health claims for food. Codex sets advisory standards and guidelines which nations may adopt or modify.

This global food police ensures countries are required to purchase from trans-national corporations in favour of their own locally produced goods (in the name of “lowering trade barriers“). What a joke. Just take a look at who is running the show…

Founded in 1962 by the UN to establish international free trade foods codex Alimentarius is jointly administered by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) through annual and regional meetings. Codex is an annual World Health Organisation (WHO) sponsored gathering of delegates in Europe, many of them members of the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR).

CA recommendations are then adopted by regulators such as the Australian TGA or the US FDA by various direct or indirect means that end up as Acts and amendments that are passed into law by Parliaments or Congress, usually without public debate. Of course, this is another example of globalisation and unconstitutional UN treaties, but messing with our global food supplies is just plain nasty. The elite of course have their own seed banks God bless ’em. While us undesirables are left with the likes of Monsanto, ADM, Sodexo and Tyson run the seed show across the globe. Seed control is ultimately food control: Didn’t Stalin nationalize farming methods that enabled his administration to gain control over the food supply?  Didn’t Stalin use the food to control the people?

It is now a criminal offence in parts of Europe to sell herbs as foods. An agreement called EEC6565 equates selling herbs as foods to selling other illegal drugs. Action is being taken to accelerate other European countries into ‘HARMonization’ as well. [read more]

CA is seemingly based neither on science nor democracy. Unelected bureaucrats, operating at the behest of industry and trade interests, not public health, make decisions which become domestic and international standards when enacted as law by the member states of the WTO. Mind you, what’s new? [P.s. those of you who thought you lived in a democracy are very, very, very much mistaken.

These standards represent the ultimate triumph of greed over good science, good sense, good health and good intent. The reach and influence of CA is (of course) global: There are at present 180 member countries.

Has this influence done more harm than good?  Has the world seen an increase in the availability of healthy food products and fair trade?  China is producing toxic baby formula.  The USA is trying to legislate seed cleaning and seed banks.  Use of toxic food additives like aspartame are increasingly pervasive in common international food products, including those products intended for children. I intend to write a few posts about Aspartame as I believe more people should be aware of this poison in our diet.

I have also learnt (surprise, surprise) that we may be exposing ourselves to GM ingredients even when buying organic products:

“We have recently observed that many soya products now carry ‘GM free’ or ‘organic’ labels, both of which imply an absence of GM ingredients in these foods.  However, most of the soya now produced in the world comes from GM varieties.”

Professor Murphy of Glamorgan University, UK

Don’t you feel just a tad shafted?!

For those of us committed to improving or maintaining our health by eating a balanced organic diet, the agenda of corporate farming and governmental regulations complying with the Codex Alimentarius proposals spell disaster.  This not only affects our access and right to additive-free, pesticide-free, industrially produced chemical-fertilizer-free and non-genetically-modified organic foods, it also threatens every participating country’s rights of national sovereignty.  In the United States of America the new federal food bills also threaten the constitutional sovereignty of the states.

Our challenge is to demonstrate that no corporate strategy can be effective against the universal desire to retain the basic human right to food and health freedom.

Oh I do hope the Obama’s wee little veggie patch isn’t left out by the Food Police.

November 29, 2009

5 Angered Frontbenchers Resign Over ETS

For those of us who are fervent “climate change deniers” the resignation of five frontbenchers of the Australian Liberal Party over the wildly controversial ETS may have come as welcome news perhaps  evoking a small, short-lived one-sided smile.

A blog on the The Telegraph Newspaper website (UK) remarks:

“Australia is leading the revolt against Al Gore’s great big AGW [Anthropogenic Global Warming] conspiracy – just as the Aussie geologist and AGW sceptic Professor Ian Plimer predicted it would.” [read more]

Small steps…

November 28, 2009

The Real Inconvenient Truth? Climategate & Birkenstocks

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself”…

-Club of Rome

Barack Obama’s top science ‘czar‘ [or ‘Tzar’- the name of the official rulers in Medieval Bulgaria, Russia and Serbia], John Holdren advocate some truly horrific proposals in the 1977 book entitled “Ecoscience“, which he co-authored with Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich. When reports of Holdren’s book first started to surface, they were quickly dismissed by many because it just seemed so utterly unbelievable that the top science advisor to the president of the United States would hold such frightening ideologies: sterilisation of the population, forced birth control and euthanasia; essentially a Planetary Regime utopia with the power to control life and death over its citizens.

This new environmental religion is coming hard and fast. As Al Gore said in the closing sentence of his statement after he won the Nobel Peace Prize … “This is just the beginning.” I wonder just how many pies Mr Gore is actually sticking his slimy reptilian tentacles in. Most people don’t realise that Gore is set to be the first “carbon tax billionaire”:

The Times report notes how Gore “has a stake in the world’s pre-eminent carbon credit trading market.” As we reported back in March, before he became President Barack Obama also helped fund the profiteers of the carbon taxation program that he is now seeking to implement as law.

The Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) has direct ties to both Al Gore and Maurice Strong, two figures intimately involved with a long standing movement to use the theory of man made global warming as a mechanism for profit and social engineering. Gore’s investment company, Generation Investment Management, which sells carbon offset opportunities, is the largest shareholder of CCX. [read more here]

But it is not just Al Gore’s personal war against climate change. We are seeing this growing movement everywhere, from the eyebrow raising “Eco-Friendly Sustainability” inserts in the Sunday Age [the wonderful Fairfax empire] to the rustic pamphlets sent to me by my energy retailer each month [telling me what CO2 reduction measures they could do for me should I feel guilty about my ‘footprint’ and pay extra: sign up here…] but few people are questioning why. Why now? Cui bono? Some people rarely contemplate beyond the “we have had the hottest summer on record” mantra.

Indeed, we are told that climate change is not debateable. Heaven forbid! from what I understand, the fundamental nature of all science is to above all question and investigate and by that measure any person who calls themself a “scientist” who is not ‘skeptical‘ is not in fact a scientist.

“Science is the engine that drives innovation, the light that shines in the moonless night of ignorance and superstition, and the best hope for solutions to most of the serious problems that plague all people, everywhere. If the presidential candidates don’t understand that, then our future may be bleak.”

-Biomed Central- Genome Biology US

Should we simply sink back into our chair and wince discretely whenever a discussion on ‘carbon footprints’ arises in dinner party conversation? To be seen as anti-carbon tax, anti-humanity, anti-middle-class “‘we care because it’s the right thing to do for our children”. Quite the opposite actually it seems. Do a little bit of research and we find that this environmentalism, touted as the next religion of humanity has those all too familiar ideologies of the NWO: globalism and eugenics. Those liberal Birkenstock wearing environmentalists are being taken for a ride.

The United Nations Population Fund has released its annual State of the World Population Report 2009 entitled “Facing a Changing World: Women, Population and Climate”. This report goes farther than any U.N. report before it by unequivocally linking population growth with climate change, and it suggests that the only way to avoid this global climate “disaster” is to increase “family planning” services around the world, reduce fertility rates and encourage families around the world to have less children. Indeed, the terms ‘climate change’, ‘carbon tax’ and ‘reducing emissions’ and the terms ‘over-population’ and ‘population control’ are being uttered frequently in the same [carbon dioxide emitting] breath.

Not only did the Club of Rome’s 1972 report, “Limits to Growth” call for a reduced level of consumption of resources, it also argued that humankind needs to re-evaluate its exploitative attitude towards humans and the earth itself. The failure to give more foreign aid is indicative of the increased selfishness of rich countries. Meanwhile, the world’s richest 20 per cent of the population consume 86 per cent of its goods and services, over half its energy and nearly half its meat and fish. The Club of Rome has been the prime mover behind the Global Warming scam, using the scaremongery generated by this highly contentious and emotive issue to gain public support for cutting CO2 emissions. While the world’s most powerful nations continue to increase their carbon footprints on a daily basis, developing countries are forced to plough their fields and turn their mills by wind and solar power alone. The perfect scam. In the book “The First Global Revolution“ (1991) the Club of Rome openly admitted, that the whole green ideology is just an artificial hoax serving as a tool to grab power.

It does not matter if this common enemy is “a real one or… one invented for the purpose.”

In the process of struggling against this implacable enemy, democracy “will be made to seem responsible for the lagging economy, the scarcity and uncertainties. The very concept of democracy could then be brought into question and allow for the seizure of power.”

-Club of Rome

In his memoirs, Rockefeller admits that the goal of all this is to unite the whole planet under a single government:

“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as “internationalists” and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

Still not convinced?

With the advent of the leaked Climategate emails [Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of ‘Anthropogenic Global Warming’?] concerning the manipulation of evidence, doubts about whether the world is really heating up, suppression of evidence, fantasies of violence towards climate change skeptics, attempting to disguise the inconvenient truth about the Medival Warm Period (MWP) and discussions on how best to remove dissenting scientist out of the peer review process. In the run up to Copenhagen, we will see more and more hysterical (and grotesquely exaggerated) stories in the mainstream media. Hopefully more and more people will not be suckered into the painfully propagandizing rhetoric and dare to debate the real ‘inconvenient truth’.

* Please consider the environment before printing

November 26, 2009

Something To Chew On: Kellogg’s, Eugenics and Race Betterment

“As a child I had a dream, a marvelous dream, in which I saw a wild place in the country. Dirty children were pouring down the road. The dream gave me the idea for my lifework…the Sanitarium. Everything here has behind it one ideal: biological living to improve the American race.”-John Harvey Kellogg

Emblazoned across the box of Kellogg’s Cocoa Krispies earlier this month (Coco Pops to anyone in the UK or Australia): “Now Helps Support Your Child’s Immunity!“.


Hang on! Where is my childhood breakfast time companion Coco the Monkey? And why do Americans get the correct spelling of “Cocoa” and the three brats from Rice Krispies (Crispies?) on the cover instead? Are Americans really more trusting of three young white kids with pixie ears and big scary eyes (the effects of a century of puffed rice laced with high fructose corn syrup) over a spritely brown big-eared monkey? I guess nutritional health claims carry more scientific weight when they’re introduced by magical singing elves Smack, Crack and Pot.

Are we naive enough to believe that cereal can increase immunity? Why, a box of cereal certainly works out cheaper than visiting the Doctors nowadays. A chocolatey spoon of puffed rice is also undoubtedly more tasty than a metal needle stabbing you in the upper arm. Why not just include a ‘free’ vial of the H1N1 vaccine (syringes sold separately) so we can all shoot up with a healthy dose of mercury and squalene before we “eat”? It may reduce the need for people to go a-rushin’ to their nearest clinic (amidst the “Oh-my-God-we-are-running-out” shortages and “God-save-us-in-the-scary-pandemic” type alerts). There you go ‘, that’s one from me. Keep it. Use it. Go on.

Apparently, the City Attorney of San Francisco, US, Dennis Herrera sent a letter to Kellogg’s and to the Food and Drug Administration in the US asking Kellogg’s to prove its claim:

“I am concerned the prominent use of the immunity claims to advertise a sugar-laden chocolate cereal like Cocoa Krispies may mislead and deceive parents of young children.”

No. Really?

Interestingly, in the same year as our friend Monsieur Kellogg (1852-1945), inventor of the cornflake, began selling cereal commercially (1906), he also founded the Race Betterment Foundation to help stop the “propagation of defectives.” Our Kellogg was also on the Advisory Council of the American Eugenics Society.

It seems that Kellogg was convinced that poor dietary and moral habits were leading America down the path of ‘race degeneration’. His solution was eugenics, not merely as a set of policies, but as a quasi-religious ideology. As you do, when you are the business of fashioning flattened flakes of corn.

Kellogg’s’ reveled in his role as defender of scientific efficiency in the realisation of power to control global breakfasting habits. Build up the monopoly; get kids hooked on sugar, playful characters and free toys and then pump whatever ‘immunity boosting’ elements you like into the boxes. For example, there are heaps of interesting articles on Folic Acid in cereal (and now we have it as mandatory for wheat flour – and therefore bread- in Australia). The ridiculousness of the entire situation is that the very target market for folic acid fortification is young women and mass medication is simply not good public health policy. [however, unlike the fluoride in the water, one does have a reasonable element of choice in what we eat for breakfast]. Like most things that get approved by food standard agencies and departments across the globe, there are too many unresolved issues and questions around safety and efficacy- nevermind the issue of the immorality of ‘mass medication’. I say: If in doubt, leave it out. But Kellogg’s insists that once we wake up we all (well, particularly impressionable young children) need to shovel down our mouths:

Rice, Sugar, Chocolate (4.5%), Cocoa Powder, Calcium Carbonate, Salt, Malt Flavouring, Flavouring, Niacin, Iron, Vitamin B6, Riboflavin B2, Thiamin B1, Folic Acid, Vitamin B12.

“Kellogg’s Krispies cereals provide consumers with 25 percent of their daily value of vitamins A, C, and E, which play an important role in boosting immunity according to peer-reviewed, published, scientific research” says Kellogg’s.

…Come on.

[Coco Pops are also 40% sugar by weight.]

In his work Plain Facts, Kellogg even prohibits those with contagious ‘urban’ diseases, such as tuberculosis, and cholera, from marrying and reproducing offspring, essentially targeting immigrants, and those whom he collectively labeled “the lower classes”. According to Kellogg, “a few generations of such a degenerating process would exterminate the [white] race, and drive it back to Darwin’s ancestral ape.” Kellogg even compared the product of miscegenation, “hybrid” humans, with mongrel dogs: “Different varieties or races of the same species may form a fertile union, the result of which is a mongrel — a cross between its two parents, possessing some of the qualities of each. All the varieties of dogs are produced by crossing different races, and so are mongrels.

One newspaper said Dr. Kellogg and Dr. Burbank were trying to make the United States into a great stock farm, by breeding for human efficiency.

“I wish we had the power to do that very thing. It would not be such a bad idea,” he continued, “it certainly would be a great deal better than to have the United States a great stock farm, breeding mongrels-which is what we are doing now.” – John H. Kellogg

Very important Americans supported this idea, from Roosevelt, Carnegie, the Rockefellers and the Kellogg family:

Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind…. Some day we will realize that the prime duty, the inescapable duty of the good citizen of the right type is to leave his blood behind him in the world, and that we have no business to perpetuate citizens of the wrong type” (1913- Roosevelt, Theodore)

Now, this is where it gets particularly interesting…

Apparently, Kellogg was a big anti-sex/anti-masturbation activist. You’ll find that he was actually on such a far end of the spectrum that he didn’t have sexual intercourse with his wife even once in their 40 years of marriage (he worked on his book “Plain Facts” on their honeymoon). It would make sense that a self-proclaimed eugenicist would want to limit the reproductive capabilities of the ‘degenerate’ population who consume the highly processed GM foodstuffs in cartoonised cardboard boxes?[ See Porn Flakes Kellogg, Graham and the Crusade for Moral Fiber]

He said (in Plain Facts):

“A plain and healthy diet, with only two meals a day, among other things, would reduce sexual feelings”

So clearly John Kellogg thought there’s link between a person’s diet and his sexual desires. Could the eugenics ideology of today’s global elite NWO have infiltrated our breakfast options by design?

Anyway, don’t let me put you off your cereal. Chew away. But please check the ingredients in “Special K” before you swallow too much…

[Me? I had fruit toast this morning. If you are interested.]