Lord Monckton – Melbourne 1st February 2010 – ETS Conference

 

 

The Sofitel Hotel Grand Ballroom was filled to capacity with a majority of the kind of Melburnians who were demonstrably happy to obediently chant the Lord’s Prayer before the anticipated Lord Monckton took to the stage. I was seriously wondering whether I had inadvertently stepped in to the wrong event; climate change skeptic Powerpoint slides to amuse earlycomers- check, Ian Plimer – check, hard uncomfortable chairs – check, but what was with the church-like introduction and the slow moving sea of Christian suited and booted conservatives? I looked about me for further clarification: I could have easily been lured in subconsciously by the free offering of jugs of cold water in the hotel lobby- it was a scorcher of a Melbourne afternoon [enter joke about global warming]. I wallowed in the fact that I hadn’t dressed up at all and was possibly going to obtain footage of some kind of secret meeting and had got in undetected by the hotel security. On the flipside I contemplated that I may have just shelled out $20 for a glass of water and a prayer in the Hotel prayer room facility.

“Good Afternoon, almost evening, Gentlemen” it begins.  

Really?! Have I made it into the ranks of knighthood? Why did nobody else seem to shift uncomfortably in their seats at this omission to address female attendees? As a side contemplation: when do we officially announce Evening? I would have left quietly at this stage if I wasn’t squished betwix two burly suits. I relax once Ian Plimer, famed Australian geologist begins with a general introduction into proven global warmings and coolings- The Little Ice Age, the Medieval Warm Period and our billion years of climate change to set the scene.

 I look around me once again and silently hope that the man in the grey suit who approaches the podium after the Lords Prayer to excited hand clapping, the 3rd Viscount of Brenchley Christopher Lord Monckton, could be our real hope of exposing the climate change fraud. Gee-wizz, he certainly has the aristocratic ‘zazz.

 “Correlation need not imply causation”, he begins. The proceeding slide was a dot chart speculating the correlation between the amount of Republican Senators in the US over a period of time against the occurrences of sunspots. The crowd seems to enjoy this pretty amusing start to the talk (and also seemed versed enough in sunspot theory enough to chuckle unhindered by any embarrassing incomprehension).Lord Monckton, eloquent and knowledgeable (and so posh he squeaked) stood to the stand and began to go through some rather complicated looking equations and charts; each PowerPoint slide heralding a Royal Portcullis (see above) positioned aloft dot charts and eugenicist-laden quotes by Al Gore (where he most cleverly substituted the word “lie” for “lay” as some kind of archaic pop at the American accent) or some equally nasty fellow affiliated with the UN, Greenpeace or the WWF.

A powerful argument against the ETS proposals is the hindering of Third World development. As most of us will already know, areas of the Third World which would traditionally be used for growing crops to feed the population are now being converted into areas generating “Biofuels”. Haiti, Lord Monckton points out, was one of the areas this happened most prominently. By limiting the available land for producing foodstuffs, clearly food prices go up, food becomes a ‘weapon’ [the UN has put out dozens of public documents calling for an 80% world population reduction. Catherine Bertini, the head of the UN food programs in 1995, paraphrased the famous Kissinger statement, “Food is power. We use it to change behavior.“]. The African Energy Cycle diagram, though crudely simple [why did he simplify and skim over worded slides and dwell on equations and fractal diagrams that only a Mathematics graduate would understand?] portrayed that the basic ‘Source, Transmission and Use’ system of generating power that will be destroyed under an ETS system and thus holding back the Third World in terms of self sufficiency and imported food reliance [so what is new?].

Lord Monckton did provide me with a lovely new fact about our friend Al Gore which I think everybody should know. It is alleged that during the filming of An Inconvenient Truth Señor Gore purchased a $4m condo in St Regis CA, only feet from the sea(a particular area he proposed would be under the sea)!  

In the UK, where they have implemented an ETS scheme already, Monckton suggested that industry is shifting overseas to China or India (who will not sign any form of ETS) destroying jobs, the economy, an increased tax bill and, yes [shock horror] a larger carbon footprint. China, it is suggested, are not going to be signing any agreement and have increased coal power plants by 1 or 2 per week. The Chairman of the IPCC owns a steel industry in Redcar, England, moved to India (the Chairman’s birth country) losing approximately 1700 UK jobs but gaining some elusive Carbon Credits for doing such a grand job of weakening the UK in the numerous aforementioned ways [ for the greener good, of course].  

The cost of Climate Change Policy, he goes on, producing a simple bar chart of how much is being spent on such ETS schemes and policies so far. Focused Adaptation he says is the answer: Paying the charge at the point [‘of sale’] and not in taxes.  

According to Monckton, The Copenhagen Treaty, Paragraph 38 stipulated:  

  • Give Government the right to set the global market- i.e an end to ‘free’ trade
  • Give Government the power to levy taxes as it feels necessary
  • Deemed ‘wealthy’ nations will be taxed 2% of their GDP
  • 2% tax on ALL financial transactions
  • 300 alleged new bureaucracies
  • A world-wide cap and trade regime
  • Unlimited non-compliance fines.

 

… And no democratic provisions he declares! Did anyone versed in NWO literature believe there would be?! Australia is not a democracy- the two party system as it is elsewhere in the western world is a fraud, funded by the same people.   

He started with “Global warming has been going on for 300 years” but now there has been “no global warming for a decade”. The IPCC declared in 1990 until 1995 that any warming on the planet could not be attributable to anthropogenic causes. The in 1995, one man suggested that the body of evidence now points to a discernable human influence on global climate. They go on in 1995 to stipulate that there is a 90% probability of human influence on the climate. Monckton mocks the IPCC stating that their ‘scientific methods’ are comparable to the talk attendees putting their hands up and the board taking that as scientific fact. Although he makes a valid point- you simply can’t stipulate a probability based on data such as the possibility of human activity.  

So, we are told- in the end- we cannot actually predict the climate anyway; that sun spot theory, cloud cover theory, other pollutants, manipulated data, having BBQ’s beneath temperature gauges in the US, fractal equations and the NWO all confuse the picture [snigger]. So what does he call for? A Royal Commission investigation into the ‘facts’! Thunderous applause from around me.

During the hasty Q and A section, a man questioned Monckton’s “cherry picking” of data from the IPCC and failure to acknowledge other aspects of the IPCC reports was threatened with removal from the vicinity if he did not let the Viscount speak! I found the over-reaction (it happened twice) to people questioning the ‘truth’ portrayed in the talk astonishing. Is this the democracy you speak of? How we would would throw our hands up if this happened at an Al Gore talk! The talk was in my opinion rather disjointed, complicated where it needn’t be and simplified where it shouldn’t have been. It also, in my opinion failed to provide any new listeners to our argument with the overarching real picture of the political framework the ETS really is set in. The IPCC have already been shown to have lied- the story is out there. The attempts to implement World Government in Copenhagen should have taken a few more slides. I ask you Lord Monckton: what is your agenda? Why did you choose a Maltese Cross to put behind you for no reason other than to speculate hypothetically what an equation would look like (the equation was a Mandelbrot fractal) – I wished my camera caught the moment more effectively, I would have posted it.

  

A lot of people will have attended the talk and enjoyed the pompous humour and religious, conservative hoo-rah [and free cooled water in stemmed glassware]. I pray [in an unreligious way] that Lord Monckton is our man to bring it to the public knowledge that Global Warming is a fraud, that the Climategate emails do question everything we think we know about science ‘fact’, that scientists at that level are paid to manipulate data for political means and that an investigation [preferably not a Monarch-funded one] should be demanded.  

I also think there is a new danger in that the boundaries between the big ‘climate change debate’ and general environmental concerns have been blurred: To be against a ETS or a Cap and Trade Scheme does not make a person ‘anti-environment’. I would surmise that having knowing the facts surrounding the history of this manufactured environmental movement, which stinks of the eugenics ideology if you look further back enough means you see the bigger picture, care about the Third World and care about the potential to cripple ourselves by propping up a green flag we know nothing at all about apart from that in our society it looks good to support the cause. I urge every supporter of such ‘action’ groups as the WWF and Greenpeace to look into the group’s history, their facts and leaders.  

  

 I also ask myself- does it matter if he exposes at least part of the NWO agenda? “Quid Est Vertitas [Tintoretto]” he declared fervently, using an old painting of the questioning by Pontius Pilate as a visual prop (cleverly providing the Christian majority in the crowd with a moral reference point). A few nodding, questioning heads and I’m sure some angsty clenched fists in laps. Where do we go from here? Is it as simple as “No taxation without verification”? In which case, I want out.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: